Citation: Frederic Jameson () Reification and utopia in mass culture. Social Text, Duke University Press (RSS). Download. To begin, though, it is necessary to clarify Jameson’s and Deleuze’s arguments. In “Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture,” Jameson directs. “In the final section of his essay, Jameson talks much about artistic The theory of mass culture-or mass audience culture, commercial culture.
|Published (Last):||6 March 2011|
|PDF File Size:||16.70 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.9 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Jameson I initially read this quote as a praise of political art as reeification worthy an object of study that its complexities could not be fully addressed within the scope of Jamesons work.
In other words, Jameson was humbly admitting that political art is deserving of its own lengthy analysis. Why, though, is Jameson incapable of addressing political art and implicitly counter culture for more than a page in his nineteen page essay describing modern culture? As I reread the rwification, I began to hear a dismissive tone in the words special place and rare.
How rare is overt political and social content? How rare are 60s protest songs? While the historicity of the category 60s can be appreciated, and indeed Jamesons use of it appears to be grounded in skepticism towards the authenticity of political art emerging outside of collective life, it seems as if Jameson is using it to contain a threat to his argument. The threat, that is, that overt political art and action have been present and overt since before the s, and continue to persist now.
I feel that, to a significant extent, his position as academic shields him from and allows him to theorize away a counterculture that has been very much alive and struggling.
Cultural Reader: Fredric Jameson: “Reification and Utopia” – summary and review
The production or assumption of a limited period of the 60s tends to perpetuate a nostalgic distance from a period of political art, counterculture, and resistance that never really ended or began. In many ways the 60s have come to resemble a safe countercultural commodity. One can easily find coffee table books on the collective rebellious phase of the baby boomers youth, or one can watch the Wonder Years or Forest Gump and recall a period before choosing to turn off, tune out, drop in.
Just a few blocks away museum visitors, were they to instead choose to visit the Tower City Mall at public square on a Sunday, would likely encounter middle class kids and homeless people dissolving cultural boundaries at Cleveland Food Not Bombs. I dont propose, in response, a hasty rejection of some mythically totalitarian historical metanarrative, but rather I propose a more complete and honest cultue that dissolves the nostalgic distance between political art then and recuperated art now.
Unfortunately for Jameson, who has chosen to ignore the reality of such a history for the sake of a commentary on his own constructed cultre, many posts examples easily come to mind. The punk rock movement, certainly with a strong collective component, produced material easily accessible to mass culture.
The Sex Pistols Anarchy in the U. Rage Against the Machine, arguably one of the more important alternative bands of the s, initiated a radical Axis of Justice with System of ufopia Down and donated all of its proceeds from a tour with U2 to organizations as overtly resistant as EZLN.
Any middle class adolescent who frequented Ozzfest or other metal festivals in the s and nass is likely aware of System of a Downs Steal This Album, or the lyrics to their politically charged Prison Song.
Someone interested in hip hop enough to scratch the surface will likely encounter KRS-1s Sound of da Police released in And Radiohead, now international superstars, have just released their latest album essentially for free, bypassing the music industry entirely.
Jameson might respond to me with a question like, yes, but why havent they worked? My answer to such a question would be precisely my historical point: Jameson cannot escape his own position within consumer capitalism in that it is his choice to perceive a large body of political art as contained within a diluted dialectic that imposes itself upon consumers.
And besides, this is not to mention the countless DIY zines circulating around Infoshops, in radical circles, and across reificztion hipster-radical bridge in trendy coffee shops. A nice account of posts anarchist praxis can be found in criminologist Jeff Ferrells Tearing Down the Streets: Adventures in Urban Anarchy, where he discusses his own experiences with collective activities as obverse as pirate radio, graffiti, and biking in critical masses.
Reification and utopia in mass culture – AcaWiki
But are these practices rare? Perhaps only to those who continue to ignore, dismiss, and keep a distance from them. Well, this is not the place to raise the complicated problem of countercultural elitism and exclusion. Reificcation the rest of the items on Jamesons list, it appears as if he has chosen examples that fit his argument of rarity. Perhaps my own ignorance is to blame for my unfamiliarity with the rest of the items on Jamesons list.
If this is the case, how is it that I was able to come up with several examples of my own? Are they simply inauthentic, easily recuperated, or not overt enough? Am Reiffication a crazy radical detached from the revolutionary potentiality of mass culture?
Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture
Or are my examples invalidated and recuperated precisely at the moment that Jamesons attitude of disengagement and struggle for theoretical security reposition them inside of some abstract near-omnipresent nightmare?
But does the myth of the rarity of genuine and overt political art- and resistance in general- honestly acknowledge a totalizing or nearly totalizing condition like Guy Debords spectacle or Lewis Mumfords megamachine, or does it merely reveal its proponents inability cultuer refusal to engage with political art and action of their contemporary milieu?
To what extent does a fear of reificqtion reproduce precisely the distance required for recuperation? The ideological component of Jamesons writing comes to bear in his own language: If we directly engage in overt political art or action, however, the University can only have us, as rare historical events, in retrospect. Tearing Down The Streets: Adventures in Urban Anarchy.
“In Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture” by Frederick Jameson Essay
New York, New York. Accessed December 31, Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, we’ll get back to you in 24 hours or less. Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?
Click to learn more https: Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! How to cite this page Choose cite format: How about make it original?
Sorry, but copying text is reificatikn on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. We’ll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but downloading is forbidden on this website. Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? Masz Answer is very helpful for Us Thank you a lot!